Smriti Bhasin vs Gio Jang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Aug at 04:04 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Bhasin vs G. Jang

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bhasin 1 - 0 Jang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Smriti Bhasin winning 2 and Gio Jang winning 0. The last match between Smriti Bhasin and Gio Jang was at the W15 Singapore, 04-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Smriti Bhasin getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bhasin | 1 |
| Jang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W15 Singapore(08-04-25)
S. Bhasin vs G. Jang H2H Profile
S. Bhasin vs G. Jang Match Preview:
- In their recent form, Bhasin has a slightly better second-serve performance, winning 36.93% of points compared to Jang's 34.48%. This minor advantage could be crucial in tight match situations.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Bhasin also leads slightly, capturing 54.93% of opponents' points versus Jang's 49.76%. Is this enough to give Bhasin the upper hand on returns?
- Regarding first serve returns, both players are fairly close, with Bhasin at 31.88% and Jang at 30.03%, suggesting a balanced match in this aspect.
- Under pressure, Bhasin narrowly edges out by saving 46.63% of breakpoints compared to Jang's 46.07%, indicating a slight advantage for Bhasin in critical moments.
- Looking at overall match performance over the past year, Jang has a better win rate of 50% compared to Bhasin's 44.12%, showing Jang might have more consistency in outcomes.
- Considering surface strengths, Bhasin’s best performance is on indoor hardcourts with a win rate of 50%, while Jang excels on hardcourts with a 52% win rate, suggesting they might each have a court advantage.
- In terms of professional experience, Jang's opponents have had a significantly higher average ranking of 61.79 compared to Bhasin's 246.03, indicating that Jang might have faced tougher competition.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Jang has a higher success rate of 50% in winning them, whereas Bhasin has won 38%, hinting at Jang's edge in endurance and psychological resilience.
- Bhasin converts breakpoints at a rate of 46.43%, slightly less effective than Jang's 48.65%, a potential advantage for Jang in high-stakes scenarios.
Editorial Prediction (August 4, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Bhasin and Jang promises to be a closely contested affair. Bhasin shows slight advantages in second serve performance and returning points, which could tilt the scales in their favor if they exploit these edges effectively during key moments of the match.
However, Jang's overall win percentage and experience against higher-ranked opponents suggest a level of consistency and resilience that may prove beneficial. Jang's proficiency on hardcourts and superior deciding set performance highlight their capacity to prevail in challenging situations.
Both players show comparable skill levels in breakpoint scenarios, but Jang's higher conversion rate could be decisive if the match comes down to pivotal breaks. Taking all these factors into account, Jang is likely to emerge as the winner in this eagerly anticipated matchup.
Smriti Bhasin vs Gio Jang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Bhasin vs G. Jang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:22:3 | Average Match Time | 1:22:3 |
| 63% (33/52) | 1st Serve % | 64% (27/42) |
| 64% (21/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 37% (10/27) |
| 47% (9/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (6/15) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 62% (26/42) | Return Points Win % | 42% (22/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Bhasin Recent Matches Played
G. Jang Recent Matches Played

S. Bhasin vs G. Jang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42.14% (67/92) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.44% (44/45) |
| 43.59% (153/198) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.47% (94/104) |
| 47.89% (1500/1632) | Games Win/Loss | 48.39% (871/929) |
| 38.32% (41/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.39% (37/35) |
| 50.00% (22/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 57 | Aces Total | 37 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 441 | Total Double Faults | 210 |
| 1:7:36 | Average Match Time | 1:5:58 |
| 331.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 269.18 |
| 64% (4773/7401) | 1st Serve % | 52% (1787/3427) |
| 55% (2613/4773) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (1029/1787) |
| 42% (1103/2628) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (681/1640) |
| 49% (440/890) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (198/391) |
| 46% (3399/7377) | Return Points Win % | 45% (1497/3292) |
| 31.91% (15/32) | Challenger W/L | 48.00% (12/13) |
| 46.43% (52/60) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (32/32) |
| 42% (66/158) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (42/86) |
| 29% (4/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 80% (4/5) |
| 41% (14/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (13/22) |
| 80% (71/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (41/35) |
| 20% (71/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (41/6) |
| 11% (88/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (48/8) |